Cases 11 - 20 of 26
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Sandoval & Sandoval, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv02413
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Sandoval & Sandoval, Inc. , Elizabeth De Sandoval and Manuel Sandoval
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Sandoval v. The Center for Innovative Gyn Care, PC et al
as 1:2017cv01599
Plaintiff:
Sarah Sandoval
Defendant:
The Center for Innovative Gyn Care, PC and Natalya Danilyants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sandoval v. The Center for Innovative Gyn Care, PC et al
as 8:2017cv01599
Plaintiff:
Sarah Sandoval
Defendant:
The Center for Innovative Gyn Care, PC and Natalya Danilyants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Sandoval & Sandoval, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv01392
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Sandoval & Sandoval, Inc., Elizabeth De Sandoval and Manuel Sandoval
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Sandoval v. Rosario's, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv03021
Plaintiff:
Orlando Sandoval
Defendant:
Rosario's, Inc., City Diner, Inc., Valentino's Restaurant, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sandoval Roca v. USA - 2255
as 8:2015cv03862
Petitioner:
Nestor Vladamir Sandoval Roca
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Acosta et al v. Kellogg Brown & Root LLC, et al.
as 8:2015cv03836
Plaintiff:
Ronald Layne Smith, Ryan C. Rasmussen, Reginald J. Belton and others
Defendant:
KBR Inc, Kellogg Brown & Root LLC, Halliburton Company and others
Receiver:
Jimmy Dwayne Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv03186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sandoval Roca v. United States Of America
as 8:2014cv00885
Petitioner:
Nestor B. Sandoval Roca
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: Motion for Return of Property
Roca v. USA-2255
as 8:2013cv03096
Petitioner:
Nestor Vladamir Sandov Roca
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
