Cases 11 - 20 of 45
FLAME-BEY v. WYATT et al
as 1:2019cv04636
Defendant:
SPURGIN, LONG, WYATT and others
Plaintiff:
YOHAN BIC FLAME-BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flame-Bey v. Wyatt et al
as 3:2019cv01022
Plaintiff:
Yohan Bic Flame-Bey and Yohan Flame
Defendant:
Spurgin, Long, Wyatt and others
Not Yet Classified:
PENDLETON CF E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NAYLOR v. SANFORD et al
as 1:2019cv03766
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and SANFORD
Plaintiff:
JOHN NAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fingers v. Carter et al
as 3:2019cv00525
Defendant:
Dr. Kardis, Ms. Lee, Mr. Carter and others
Plaintiff:
Derek N. Fingers, Derek D Fingers and Derek Dontia Fingers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Peppers v. Sanders et al
as 3:2019cv00039
Plaintiff:
Robin DK Peppers and Robin Dale Kilgor Peppers
Defendant:
Mariana Gerolimatos, Jeffrey L Sanford and Thomas J Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN v. MARNOCHA et al
as 2:2018cv00502
Defendant:
JOHN M. MARNOCHA, JOHN E. BRODEN, HUGH R. HUNT and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN L. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. SANFORD et al
as 1:2018cv03280
Plaintiff:
NATHAN L. ADAMS
Defendant:
JENNIFER SCHURMAN, CHRISTOPHER SANFORD and SARAH NAPPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENDRICKS v. CARTER et al
as 1:2018cv02874
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E. HENDRICKS
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, LONG, DANIEL ARNOLD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanford v. Warden
as 3:2018cv00317
Petitioner:
Ronald L Sanford, Jr
Respondent:
Warden
Miscellaneous_party:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LEFLORE v. LEMMON et al
as 1:2018cv00503
Defendant:
DUANE ALSIP, ANDREW COLE, OFFICER DANIELS and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD LEFLORE
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
