Cases 11 - 20 of 391
Sorrick v. West et al
as 1:2024cv00744
Plaintiff:
Kevin Sorrick
Defendant:
Warden, Warden Walter West, Warden Deborah Darden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Joint Base Andrews et al
as 8:2024cv01240
Plaintiff:
Kurt Alexander
Defendant:
Joint Base Andrews, Secretary Frank Kendall, Jason Stack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00936
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Kaetzel v. The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
as 1:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Kaetzel
Defendant:
The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Aurel v. Nwanguma et al
as 1:2023cv03527
Plaintiff:
Aurel Mich and Mich Aurel
Defendant:
Chuma Nwanguma, A. Adeniyi, Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner et al v. Blinken et al
as 1:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
maxine turner and VICTOR JEAN MARIE QUENTIN
Defendant:
ANTONY J BLINKEN, Asst. Secretary Rena Bitter, deputy chief david r mccawley and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
