Cases 11 - 20 of 84
EARLEY v. DOUGHERTY et al
as 1:2022cv01855
Plaintiff:
KESHAUN EARLEY
Defendant:
DET. LYNNE DOUGHERTY and SETH LEVY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv18677
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv20325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
SHARIFI v. COUNTY OF MERCER et al
as 3:2021cv18097
Plaintiff:
PARASTU SHARIFI
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MERCER, TOWNSHIP OF EAST WINDSOR, EAST WINDSOR MUNICIPAL COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DANIELS v. CITY OF BURLINGTON, NJ et al
as 1:2021cv16662
Plaintiff:
MR. SETH DANIELS and SETH DANIELS
Defendant:
CITY OF BURLINGTON, NJ, BURLINGTON TOWNSHIP, MICHAEL WRIGHT and others
STOCKHOLM v. MCKESSON CORP. et al
as 3:2021cv13607
Plaintiff:
SETH STOCKHOLM
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK & CO., INC. and MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. LEVINE
as 2:2021cv05719
Defendant:
SETH P LEVINE and SETH P. LEVINE
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
KANER et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2021cv05828
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.
Plaintiff:
SETH KANER and THE ESTATE OF SUSAN M. KANER
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2021cv00573
Defendant:
PATRICK DUGAN, JOEL JOHNSON, GERALD MAY and others
Plaintiff:
REGINALD LEE DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv12744
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
