Cases 11 - 20 of 93
SHEPHERD v. COYLE
as 2:2021cv01591
Plaintiff:
TYRONE SHEPHERD
Defendant:
ANNE MARIE COYLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JUSTICE v. CORELOGIC, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01542
Defendant:
CLAUDIA FAN MUNCE, W. STEVE ALBRECHT, JAYNIE MILLER STUDENMUND and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY D. JUSTICE, II.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
MILUZZO et al v. MORGAN et al
as 2:2020cv05537
Defendant:
TRACY MORGAN and GARETH MORGAN
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MILUZZO and CHRISTINE SHEPHERD-MILUZZO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILUZZO et al v. MORGAN et al
as 2:2020cv05539
Defendant:
TRACY MORGAN and GARETH MORGAN
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MILUZZO and CHRISTINE SHEPHERD-MILUZZO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00759
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
IN RE: RAILWAY INDUSTRY EMPLOYEE NO-POACH ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 2:2018mc00798
Defendant:
KNORR BRAKE COMPANY, FAIVELEY TRANSPORT NORTH AMERICA INC., WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE CO. and others
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY KERR, TIMOTHY BACCO, BRIAN LARA and others
In Re:
IN RE: RAILWAY INDUSTRY EMPLOYEE NO-POACH ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Special Master:
DAVID B. WHITE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
SHEPHERD et al v. TALOTTA et al
as 2:2020cv01046
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH SHEPHERD and PAUL SHEPHERD
Defendant:
U-HAUL, VINCENZO TALOTTA, LIBERTY MUTUAL MID-ATLANTIC INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv05349
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
SHEPHERD v. HTD CONSULTING, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv05157
Defendant:
JOHN AND/OR JANE DOE, HENRY T. DAVIS, HTD CONSULTING, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SHEPHERD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
