Cases 11 - 20 of 151
Williams v. Hillhouse et al
as 6:2023cv00298
Defendant:
Chris Tinsley, Derick Choice, Nancy Perryman and others
Plaintiff:
Jay Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Durst v. Smith County et al
as 6:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
Jacob Durst
Defendant:
Smith County, Unknown William, Unknown Blackmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Durst v. Smith County
as 6:2023cv00283
Petitioner:
Jacob Durst
Respondent:
Smith County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunter v. Boller et al
as 6:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Hunter
Defendant:
Officer FNU Boller, Officer FNU Mitchell, Officer FNU Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baize v. District One et al
as 6:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
Angelena N. Baize
Defendant:
District One, Henderson County, TX, Smith County, TX and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Douglas v. Smith County
as 6:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
Roderick Lamond Douglas
Defendant:
Smith County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ereman v. Sheriff, Smith County
as 6:2022cv00430
Petitioner:
Darrell Ereman
Respondent:
Sheriff, Smith County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morgan v. Smith
as 6:2022cv00358
Petitioner:
Raymond Lonzo Morgan
Respondent:
Smith County Sheriff Larry . Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
