Cases 11 - 16 of 16
Ebony Batts, et al v. William Adams, Jr., et al
as 11-57230
Plaintiff - Appellee:
EBONY LATRICE BATTS, an individual, AKA Phoenix Phenom and MANFRED MOHR, an individual
Defendant:
WILLIAM ADAMS, Jr., all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, ALLAN PINEDA, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, JAIME GOMEZ, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas and others
Defendant - Appellant:
STACY FERGUSON, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, EMI APRIL MUSIC, INC. and HEADPHONE JUNKIE PUBLISHING, LLC
Ebony Batts, et al v. William Adams, Jr., et al
as 11-56921
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EBONY LATRICE BATTS, an individual, AKA Phoenix Phenom and MANFRED MOHR, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM ADAMS, Jr., all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, ALLAN PINEDA, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, JAIME GOMEZ, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas and others
Ebony Latrice Batts et al v. William Adams, Jr. et al
as 2:2010cv08123
Defendant:
William Adams, Jr., Cherry River Music Co., EMI April Music, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ebony Latrice Batts and Manfred Mohr
Grounded Music Inc. v. Stacy Ann Ferguson et al
as 2:2009cv06776
Plaintiff:
Grounded Music Inc.
Defendant:
Stacy Ferguson, William James Adams, Jr., EMI April Music Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Treadway v. Wilkinson, et al
as 08-31112
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEE TREADWAY
Defendant - Appellee:
TIM WILKINSON, STACY FERGUSON, D BEAUBOEUF and others
Kris Taylor v. Allan Pineda et al
as 2:2007cv05102
Plaintiff:
Kris Taylor
Defendant:
Allan Pineda, William Adams, Stacy Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
