Cases filed in Arizona
Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Stanford v. Shartle
as 4:2017cv00486
Petitioner: Bryan Stanford
Respondent: Unknown Shartle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Young v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv03093
Plaintiff: Stanford L Young, Sr.
Defendant: C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shuster et al v. Shuster We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv03315
Plaintiff: Jason Shuster and Devon Shuster
Defendant: Stanford Jay Shuster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hempfling et al v. Stanford et al
as 2:2015cv02268
Plaintiff: Lee Kent Hempfling and Suesie Kent Hempfling
Defendant: Amanda Stanford and Lynn Hurley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hempfling et al v. Stanford et al
as 2:2015cv01475
Plaintiff: Lee Kent Hempfling and Suesie Kent Hempfling
Defendant: Amanda Stanford, Lynn Hurley and Pinal County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eden #246262 v. Brnovich et al
as 2:2015cv01441
Plaintiff: Jace F Eden
Defendant: Mark Brnovich, Eryn M McCarthy, Amanda Stanford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Voyles et al
as 2:2015cv01386
Plaintiff: Rhonda Cox
Defendant: Lando Voyles , Paul R Babeu , Samuel Hunt and others
Intervenor: Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharp #194939 v. Stanford
as 4:2014cv01960
Plaintiff: David Lee Sharp
Defendant: KC Stanford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanford v. Ryan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00175
Respondent: Charles L Ryan, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Thomas C Horne
Petitioner: Robert B Stanford, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ferrell v. Ryan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv00305
Respondent: Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner: Stanford Lamar Ferrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?