Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Barron v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2015cv04028
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Catherine Barron
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Potter v. City of Dubuque, Iowa et al
as 2:2015cv01009
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Potter
Defendant:
City of Dubuque, Iowa and Jay Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hafner et al v. City of Dubuque, Iowa et al
as 2:2015cv01002
Plaintiff:
Angela Hafner and Suzanne Potter
Defendant:
City of Dubuque, Iowa, Jay Murray and Nick Schlosser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00373
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. United States of America
as 1:2012cv00024
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Lynn Armstrong
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Levitt v. Lourens et al
as 4:2012cv00052
Plaintiff:
Suzanne J. Levitt
Defendant:
H. C. Lourens, Demindex Resources Corp. LTD and Oosthuizen Attorneys
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Johnson v. Mel Foster Co. Insurance, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00144
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Johnson
Defendant:
Mel Foster Co. Insurance, Inc. and Suzanne M. Martens
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Montgomery v. City of Ames, Iowa et al
as 4:2011cv00453
Plaintiff:
Tamela Montgomery
Defendant:
City of Ames, Iowa, Suzanne Owens, Heath Ropp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grimm v. Vinckel et al
as 3:2010cv00050
Plaintiff:
Carla Grimm
Defendant:
Suzanne M. Vinckel and City of Wapello
Third_party_plaintiff:
Suzanne M. Vinckel
Third_party_defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cross_claimant:
City of Wapello
Cross_defendant:
Suzanne M. Vinckel and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Allen v. Fayram et al
as 1:2010cv00056
Plaintiff:
Jason James Allen
Defendant:
John Fayram, David Richter, Suzanne Danzin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
