Cases 11 - 20 of 32
SADRGILANY et al v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.
as 3:2021cv16155
Plaintiff:
HASSAN SADRGILANY and DEBORAH DAMES
Defendant:
T-MOBILE USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SADRGILANY et al v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.
as 2:2021cv16155
Plaintiff:
HASSAN SADRGILANY and DEBORAH DAMES
Defendant:
T-MOBILE USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SAVICK et al v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.
as 3:2021cv16005
Plaintiff:
NORMA SAVICK and MARK SAVICK
Defendant:
T-MOBILE USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SAADEH v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.
as 2:2021cv12871
Defendant:
T-MOBILE USA, INC.
Plaintiff:
SAMEH A. SAADEH
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 251
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv13445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv04341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
LEONARD PARNESS TRUCKING CORP. v. OMNIPOINT COMM, INC.
as 2:2013cv04148
Plaintiff:
LEONARD PARNESS TRUCKING CORP.
Defendant:
OMNIPOINT COMM., INC. and T-MOBILE USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1) Rent, Lease & Ejectment
LAIDLAW PROPERTIES, LLC et al v. OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv03737
Plaintiff:
LAIDLAW PROPERTIES, LLC and 66 LAIDLAW AVENUE, LLC
Defendant:
OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. , T-MOBILE USA, INC. , T-MOBILE NORTHEAST, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
MARTINEZ v. STATE OF NEW YORK et al
as 2:2012cv07541
Plaintiff:
GILBERT M. MARTINEZ
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW YORK, QUEENS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, KINGS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
