Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Cohea v. Melo
as 4:2014cv04288
Plaintiff:
Danny James Cohea
Defendant:
M. Melo, Thelton E. Henderson, John L. Noonan, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Bishop v. Kelly Harrington, et al
as 14-15145
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT BISHOP
Defendant - Appellee:
KELLY HARRINGTON, Warden, M. D. BITER, Warden, J. SOTO and others
Michael Todd v. CDCR, et al
as 13-15803
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY TODD
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON CORCORAN, D. J. RUIZ and others
Todd v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilition et al
as 1:2012cv01003
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Todd
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilition, California State Prison, Corcoran, D.J. Ruiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamon v. Amrheign et al
as 1:2012cv00296
Plaintiff:
Barry Louis Lamon
Defendant:
B. Amrheign, Austin, Brad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. State of California et al
as 5:2011cv06715
Plaintiff:
Robert P. Smith, III
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, D. Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. State of California et al
as 3:2011cv06715
Plaintiff:
Robert P. Smith, III
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, D. Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Pena, et al.
as 1:2011cv01205
Plaintiff:
John Edward Mitchell
Defendant:
Pena, H.A. Sumaya, T. Cano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lamon v. Amrhein, et al.
as 1:2011cv00615
Plaintiff:
Barry Louis Lamon
Defendant:
B Amrhein, Austin, Brad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomez v. Diaz et al
as 1:2011cv00461
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Gomez
Defendant:
A. Diaz, R. Davis, R. Chavez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
