Cases 11 - 20 of 65
Robert Michael Vanleeuwen v. Warden
as 5:2021cv01593
Petitioner:
Robert Michael Vanleeuwen and Tafoya
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Judson et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 3:2021cv05290
Defendant:
Wilbur-Ellis Nutrition, LLC, Monsanto Company, Wilbur-Ellis Company, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Walter Judson, Karen Seaman, Martha Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters et al v. The City of Irvine
as 8:2021cv00281
Defendant:
The City of Irvine
Plaintiff:
John Tafoya and Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tafoya v. Juul Labs Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv08852
Defendant:
McLane Company, Inc., James Monsees, Altria Enterprises LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Monique Gonzales Tafoya and RIAZ VALANI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PC) Gogol v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2020cv01397
Defendant:
R. Cavazos, J. Attschuler, M. Hernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Gogol
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Robert Michael Vanleeuwen v. Riverside Sheriffs Office et al
as 5:2020cv00957
Defendant:
Riverside Sheriffs Office and John Doe 1
Plaintiff:
Robert Michael Vanleeuwen and Robert Michael Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00010
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ma Norma Perez Tafoya v. United States of America
as 2:2019cv10932
Plaintiff:
Ma Norma Perez Tafoya
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Tafoya v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2019cv10913
Plaintiff:
Ma Norma Perez Tafoya
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
