Cases 11 - 20 of 47
MOHARAM v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2021cv02607
Plaintiff:
FAHMI AHMED MOHARAM
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, TERRORIST SCREENING CENTER, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Lassana Magassa v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 21-35700
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LASSANA MAGASSA
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, DAVID PEKOSKE, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration and others
Mustapha Assi v. USDHS, et al
as 21-71156
Petitioner:
MUSTAPHA ASSI
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security, TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and others
Mohamed Seraji v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 21-5007
Defendant / Appellee:
Christopher A. Wray, In his official capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, David P. Pekoske, In his official capacity as Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration, Charles H. Kable, IV, In his official capacity as Director of the Terrorist Screening Center and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mohamed Al Seraji, An individual
Yonas Fikre v. FBI, et al
as 20-35904
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL NAKASONE, Director of the National Security Agency, JOSEPH MAGUIRE, Acting Director of National Intelligence, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YONAS FIKRE
Abdulaziz Ghedi v. Kevin McAleenan, et al
as 20-10995
Defendant / Appellee:
Charles Kable, IV, in his official capacity as Director of the Terrorist Screening Center, David Pekoske, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration, Kevin McAleenan, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Abdulaziz Ghedi
Mohammed Jibril, et al v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 20-5202
Defendant / Appellee:
Christopher A. Wray, in his official capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Charles H. Kable, IV, in his official capacity as Director of the Terrorist Screening Center, David P. Pekoske, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ala'a Jibril, individually, Mohammed Jibril, individually, and on behalf of their minor children Y.J., and O.J., Aida Shahin, individually, and on behalf of their minor children Y.J., and O.J. and others
Khalid Turaani v. Christopher Wray, et al
as 20-1343
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KHALID M. TURAANI
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES H. KABLE, IV, in his official capacity as Director of the Terrorist Screening Center, CHRISTOPHER WRAY, in his official capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and JASON CHAMBERS, in his individual capacity
Anas Elhady v. Charles Kable, IV
as 20-1311
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SAMIR ANWAR, WAEL HAKMEH, MURAT FRLJUCKIE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Acting Commissioner of United States Customs and Border Protection in his official capacity, CHARLES H. KABLE, IV, Director of the Terrorist Screening Center, in his official capacity, NICHOLAS J. RASMUSSEN, Director of the National Counterterrorism Center in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae:
THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE, CATO INSTITUTE, FRED T. KOREMATSU CENTER FOR LAW & EQUALITY and others
Not Yet Classified:
ALAN MICHAEL MYGATT-TAUBER
Charles Kable, IV v. Anas Elhady
as 20-154
Respondent:
MICHAEL EDMUND COLEMAN, MUHAMMAD YAHYA KHAN, JOHN DOE, No. 4 and others
Petitioner:
CHARLES H. KABLE, IV, Director of the Terrorist Screening Center, in his official capacity, NICHOLAS J. RASMUSSEN, Director of the National Counterterrorism Center in his official capacity, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Acting Commissioner of United States Customs and Border Protection in his official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
