Cases 11 - 20 of 81
Stallard v. United States Patent and Trademark Office
as 1:2022cv01236
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Stallard
Defendant:
United States Patent and Trademark Office
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Apple Inc. v. United States Patent and Trademark Office et al
as 1:2022cv01231
Plaintiff:
Apple Inc.
Defendant:
United States Patent and Trademark Office, United States Patent and Trademark Office Director, The United States Patent and Trademark Office and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1071 Appeal of Decision of U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Pasquine v. United States Patent and Trademark Office
as 1:2022cv00469
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Pasquine
Defendant:
United States Patent and Trademark Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Cirba Inc. et al v. Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office et al
as 1:2022cv00403
Plaintiff:
Cirba Inc., Cirba IP, Inc. and Cirba Inc. doing business as DENSIFY
Defendant:
Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, USPTO and United States Patent and Trademark Office
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Product Management Services v. United States Patent and Trademark Office
as 1:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
Product Management Services
Defendant:
United States Patent and Trademark Office
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Bacardi & Company Limited et al v. United States Patent and Trademark Office et al
as 1:2021cv01441
Plaintiff:
Bacardi & Company Limited and Bacardi U.S.A. Inc.
Defendant:
United States Patent and Trademark Office and Drew Hirshfeld
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Boundy v. United States Patent and Trademark Office(USPTO)
as 1:2021cv01366
Plaintiff:
DAVID BOUNDY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. et al v. United States Patent and Trademark Office et al
as 1:2021cv00899
Plaintiff:
Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. and Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP
Defendant:
USPTO, Department of Commerce, Andrew Hirshfeld and United States Patent and Trademark Office
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
