Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 235
Deborah Wilson v. Michael Astrue, et al
as 13-55247
Plaintiff - Appellant: DEBORAH KAY WILSON
Defendant - Appellee: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, individually and in his capacity as Commissioner of United States Social Security, TIMOTHY GEITHNER, individually and in his capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Treasury, ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, individually and in his capacity as United States Attorney General and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-10097
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Legatus, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 13-1092
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant: LEGATUS, DANIEL WEINGARTZ and WEINGARTZ SUPPLY COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee: TIMOTHY GEITHNER, Secretary of the United States Department of the Treasury, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of the Treasury, HILDA SOLIS, Secretary of the United States Department of the Treasury and others
Legatus, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 13-1093
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant: LEGATUS, WEINGARTZ SUPPLY COMPANY and DANIEL WEINGARTZ, President of Weingartz Supply Company
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, HILDA SOLIS, Secretary of the United States Department of Labor and others
Deborah Wilson v. Michael Astrue, et al
as 13-55091
Plaintiff - Appellant: DEBORAH KAY WILSON
Defendant - Appellee: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, individually and in his capacity as Commissioner of United States Social Security, TIMOTHY GEITHNER, individually and in his capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Treasury, ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, individually and in his capacity as United States Attorney General and others
Infrastructure Alternatives, Inc. et al v. Sebelius et al
as 1:2013cv00031
Plaintiff: Infrastructure Alternatives, Inc. , William J. Cretens and Dana Trierweiler
Defendant: Kathleen Sebelius, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Hilda L. Solis and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Deborah Wilson v. Michael Astrue, et al
as 13-55021
Plaintiff - Appellant: DEBORAH KAY WILSON
Defendant - Appellee: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, individually and in his capacity as Commissioner of United States Social Security, TIMOTHY GEITHNER, individually and in his capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Treasury, ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, individually and in his capacity as United States Attorney General and others
Autocam Corporation, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-2673
Plaintiff - Appellant: AUTOCAM CORPORATION, AUTOCAM MEDICAL, LLC, JOHN KENNEDY and others
Defendant - Appellee: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, HILDA L. SOLIS, names as Hilda Solis; Secretary of the United States Department of Labor and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-20817
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
The Catholic Diocese of Nashvi, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 12-6590
Plaintiff - Appellant: THE CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF NASHVILLE, CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF TENNESSEE, INCORPORATED, FATHER RYAN HIGH SCHOOL, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, HILDA SOLIS, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Labor, TIMOTHY GEITHNER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Treasury and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?