Cases 11 - 20 of 216
Baker v. Superior Courts of California
as 3:2024cv00449
Petitioner:
Jamaul Lee Baker
Respondent:
Superior Courts of California and Trent Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Allen
as 4:2024cv00005
Petitioner:
Derek A. Hill
Respondent:
Acting Warden Trent Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Trent William Pell v. Matt Hardesty
as 5:2023cv02463
Petitioner:
Trent William Pell
Respondent:
Matt Hardesty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Mejia v. Allen
as 2:2023cv02823
Petitioner:
Geronimo Mejia
Respondent:
Trent Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pacheco v. Allen et al
as 3:2023cv06020
Plaintiff:
Luis Pacheco
Defendant:
Trent Allen, Ayala and Orozca
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Allen et al
as 3:2023cv04391
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ray Baker
Defendant:
Trent Allen, Lt. J. Parks, C. Tanori and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. City of Bakersfield et al
as 1:2023cv01286
Plaintiff:
Osvaldo Rodriguez
Defendant:
City of Bakersfield, Steven Glenn, Trent Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv07015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Christopher Meza v. Daniel Quidort et al
as 5:2023cv01379
Plaintiff:
Christopher Meza
Defendant:
Daniel Quidort, Trent Tunstall, Tanya Karakesisoglu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tyrell Ainsworth v. Jeff Macombre et al
as 2:2023cv04263
Plaintiff:
Tyrell Ainsworth
Defendant:
Jeff Macombre, Trent Allen, Tammy L. Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
