Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Edwards v. Owens et al
as 1:2014cv00138
Plaintiff:
Eric Maxwell Edwards
Defendant:
Rissie Owens, Roman Chavez, Juanita Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Texas Board of Pardons & Paroles et al
as 1:2014cv00734
Defendant:
Greg Abott, Parole Officer J. Buentello, Unit Supervisor Landra Celestial and others
Plaintiff:
William E. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Blackwell v. Troy Fox, et al
as 13-40636
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER BLACKWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
TROY FOX, Parole Commissioner, JAMES HENSARLING, Parole Commissioner and MANDATORY SUPERVISION BOARD MEMBERS
Mallett v. Fox
as 4:2012cv00901
Plaintiff:
Michael R Mallett
Defendant:
Troy Fox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Thaler et al
as 1:2011cv00657
Plaintiff:
Gary Wayne Barnes
Defendant:
Troy Fox, Rissie L. Owens and Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roy Miller, Jr. v. Troy Fox, et al
as 10-20701
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY MACK MILLER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
TROY FOX, Administrator, Board of Pardons and Parole, BRAD LIVINGSTON, Director of Texas Department of Criminal Justice and VOTING PANEL, Voting of Plaintiff's MRIS Parole
Franklin v. Thaler et al
as 6:2010cv00081
Petitioner:
Michael Franklin
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Roger Nichols and Troy Fox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Kyles v. Gerald Garrett, et al
as 10-40938
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD DELANEY KYLES
Defendant - Appellee:
GERALD GARRETT and TROY FOX
Gibson v. Thaler et al
as 6:2010cv00016
Petitioner:
Kenneth E. Gibson
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Roger Nichols and Troy Fox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douthit v. Owens et al
as 1:2010cv00151
Defendant:
Richard Aiello, Troy Fox, David Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
