Cases 11 - 20 of 40
HENRY et al v. LANE et al
as 2:2016cv01239
Plaintiff:
TERI R. HENRY and VIRGIL G. HENRY
Defendant:
LINDA LANE, DAVID MAY-STEIN, MARY-JANE CONLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TERI WOODS PUBLISHING, LLC v. IMANI ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv04490
Plaintiff:
TERI WOODS PUBLISHING, LLC
Defendant:
IMANI ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC., IMANI HALLEY and YOLANDA HALLEY
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MOFFETT v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv02427
Plaintiff:
TERI L. MOFFETT
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Product Liability
RHODES v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2015cv00006
Petitioner:
TERI ANNE RHODES
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and JOHN TUTTLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HUNTER et al v. PFIZER INC. et al
as 2:2014cv07329
Plaintiff:
HAYLEY HUNTER and TERI HUNTER
Defendant:
PFIZER INC., WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., WYETH, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01519
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
GUERIN et al v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
as 2:2014cv06054
Plaintiff:
TERI GUERIN and CHRISTIAN GUERIN
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HUNTER v. MCCLURE PLUMMER et al
as 5:2014cv05971
Plaintiff:
GARY S HUNTER
Defendant:
TERI PLUMMER MCCLURE , UNITED PARCEL SERVICE , ALAN LOWNE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00746
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
