Cases 11 - 20 of 115
Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corp. d/b/a METRA v. International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers - Transportation Division et al
as 1:2021cv05988
Plaintiff:
Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corp. d/b/a METRA and Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Rail Corporation
Defendant:
International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers - Transportation Division, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen and Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Alliance of Police, Chapter 267
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BNSF Railway Company v. Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen et al
as 1:2021cv05965
Plaintiff:
BNSF Railway Company
Defendant:
Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen, International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers - Transportation Division, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers-Transportation Division et al
as 1:2021cv05622
Plaintiff:
Norfolk Southern Railway Co. and Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Defendant:
International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers, Transportation Division, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen, Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail & Transportation Workers, Transportation Division et al
as 1:2021cv05502
Plaintiff:
Union Pacific Railroad Company and Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
Defendant:
International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail & Transportation Workers, Transportation Division, Roy Davis, Luke EDINGTON and others
Petitioner:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers-Transportation Division et al
as 1:2021cv05182
Plaintiff:
Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
Defendant:
Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers-Transportation Division and Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Jeff Franke, et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co, et al
as 21-3848
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFF FRANKE, STEVEN FRYE and GREG FISH
Defendant / Appellee:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, aka Norfolk Southern Corporation, BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS and others
Samuel Wyatt v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 5:2021cv01609
Plaintiff:
Samuel Wyatt
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers Transportation Division, SMART TD GO877 and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
BLET v. Union Pacific Railroad
as 21-50544
Defendant / Appellant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen
Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 3:2021cv00122
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
National Railroad Passenger Co, et al v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engi
as 21-15825
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD SIGNALMEN, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYEES and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TTX COMPANY, CENTRAL CALIFORNIA TRACTION COMPANY, LOS ANGELES JUNCTION RAILWAY and others
Defendant:
JULIE A. SU, in her official capacity as Labor Commissioner, State of California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
