Cases 11 - 20 of 1,481
Denham v. United States Government et al
as 3:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Cos O. Denham
Defendant:
United States Government and City of Union, MS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Denham v. United States Government et al
as 3:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Cos O. Denham
Defendant:
United States Government and Mississippi Department of Human Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BURNS v. GOOLDIN et al
as 1:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE KAIN BURNS and KEVIN LEE
Defendant:
CHERYL GOOLDIN, JOHN GOOLDIN, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Matthew Jones v. Judicial Branch of United States Government
as 24-5090
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Judicial Branch of United States Government
Pittman v. United States Government
as 1:2024cv02909
Plaintiff:
Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kashelkar v. The United States Government
as 1:2024cv02722
Plaintiff:
Ashok Kashelkar
Defendant:
The United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hutchison v. Honeywell International, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01030
Plaintiff:
Mr. Robert C. Hutchison
Defendant:
Honeywell International, Inc., Honeywell Electronics, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. United states Government
as 1:2024cv01127
Plaintiff:
Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant:
United states Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Sutton v. United States Government
as 1:2024cv02533
Plaintiff:
Kareem Sutton
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marshall v. State of California, et al.
as 24-1938
Plaintiff:
GUS WHO MARSHALL
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, VALLEY WATER, State owned company and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
