Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 11 - 20 of 2,712
JAMES v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv01544
Petitioner: DEVORIS JAMES
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CANNON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS WARDEN AT UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY -- TERRE HAUTE INDIANA et al
as 2:2024cv00439
Plaintiff: GREGORY L. CANNON
Defendant: WOLF, CASE MANAGER -- A-L UNIT and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS WARDEN AT UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY -- TERRE HAUTE INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
VANDERMOLEN v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00437
Petitioner: KURTIS JAMES VANDERMOLEN
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Compton v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00747
Respondent: Warden
Petitioner: Daniel Compton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DURHAM v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv01528
Respondent: WARDEN
Petitioner: DARRELL S. DURHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lazur v. Lake County Sheriff et al
as 2:2024cv00309
Defendant: Stozer, John Doe, Lake County Sheriff and others
Plaintiff: Richard Lazur
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newell v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00367
Petitioner: Brandon Newell
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00357
Petitioner: Michael R. Baker, Jr.
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00715
Respondent: Warden
Petitioner: James Michael Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Conner v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00706
Petitioner: Robert David Conner and Robert D Conner
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?