Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza
as 20-1626
Respondent: IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Deputy DIrector and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the DIrector for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff and others
Respondent / Appellee: STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections, TODD M. LYONS, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Boston Field Office of Immigrations and Customs Enforcement and CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Department of Homeland Security
Petitioner / Appellant: JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated and MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated
Interested Party: RICK RAEMISCH, JULIO MEDEIROS NEVES JUNIO, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS and others
Sallaj v. Barr, et al
as 20-1649
Petitioner: SHAHDAN SALLAJ
Respondent: MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of Director, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, US IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, "ICE", CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary, Department of Homeland Security and others
Molina, et al v. Albence, et al
as 20-1629
Petitioner: ADRIANO DA SILVA MEDEIROS, LUIS ORLANDO DURAND LUYO and JOSE MARCOS PALACIOS MOLINA
Respondent: TODD M. LYONS, Acting Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Acting Director, U.S, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, DANIEL W. MARTIN, Warden, Donald W. Wyatt Detention Facility and others
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza, et al
as 20-1564
Petitioner: JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated and MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated
Respondent: IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Deputy DIrector and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the DIrector for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections and others
Interested Party: RICK RAEMISCH, JULIO MEDEIROS NEVES JUNIO, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00216
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00215
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Luistilus Bonnet v. Smith
as 19-2036
Defendant / Appellant: YOLANDA SMITH
Plaintiff / Appellee: CLAUDE MARY LUISTILUS BONNET
Defendant: STEVEN W. TOMPKINS and TODD M. LYONS
Not Yet Classified: YOLANDA SMITH, Superintendent of Suffolk County Department of Corrections
Respondent: TODD M. LYONS, acting Boston Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement and STEVEN W. TOMPKINS, Suffolk County Sheriff
Hernandez Lara v. Lyons We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-2019
Not Yet Classified: TODD M. LYONS, Acting Director, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and ANA RUTH HERNANDEZ LARA
Respondent: CHRISTOPHER BRACKETT, Superintendent, Strafford County Department of Corrections
Kinuthia v. Carr, et al
as 19-1886
Petitioner / Appellant: NAOMI WAHU KINUTHIA
Respondent / Appellee: WILLIAM P. BARR, US Attorney General, U.S Department of Justice, DONNA CARR, Chief Clerk, Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), TODD M. LYONS, Acting ICE Field Officer Director, ERO Boston and others
Kinuthia v. Barr, et al
as 19-1858
Petitioner / Appellant: NAOMI WAHU KINUTHIA
Respondent / Appellee: TODD M. LYONS, U.S. ICE-Immigration Custom Enforcement Field Office, acting Director Boston Field Office, WILLIAM P. BARR, DONNA CARR and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?