Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Grynberg et al v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 1:2016cv02628
Plaintiff:
Jack J. Grynberg and Grynberg Petroleum Company
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Buhl v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2015cv01179
Plaintiff:
Leroy Buhl
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, John Dignam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKern v. Upton et al
as 1:2015cv00760
Plaintiff:
Stacey Ella McKern
Defendant:
Jody R. Upton, U.S. Department of Justice and F.B.O.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinson v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 1:2014cv03393
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and John Dignam
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Stratis v. U.S. Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Agency
as 1:2014cv02874
Petitioner:
John M Stratis
Respondent:
U.S. Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
Terrell-Bey v. Colon et al
as 1:2014cv01042
Plaintiff:
Brooks Terrell-Bey
Defendant:
Juan Colon, G. Hall, Richard Schott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vernier v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2013cv01314
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Vernier
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Leffebre v. Berkebile et al
as 1:2012cv02891
Petitioner:
Andre Leffebre
Respondent:
David Berkebile, Federal Bureau of Prisons and U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Toodle v. Holder et al
as 1:2012cv02521
Plaintiff:
Sandra B. Toodle
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder and U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Horob v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2012cv02106
Plaintiff:
Todd Kenneth Horob
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
