Cases 11 - 20 of 256
Seberson v. University of Minnesota
as 0:2023cv02751
Plaintiff:
Andrea Seberson
Defendant:
University of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Patterson Dental Supply, Inc. v. Creighton Management Services et al
as 0:2023cv02742
Defendant:
Creighton Management Services, CMA, University Pediatric Dentistry, P.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Patterson Dental Supply, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Martin v. University of Minnesota
as 0:2023cv02665
Plaintiff:
Jasmyn Martin
Defendant:
University of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Dittberner et al v. University of Minnesota
as 0:2023cv02630
Plaintiff:
Geoff Dittberner and Mary Wint
Defendant:
University of Minnesota
Petitioner:
Jasmyn Martin and Andrea Seberson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Moore v 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02553
Plaintiff:
Phillip C Moore, Jr
Defendant:
3M Company and Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv02222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv02199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Tafelski v. Progressive Universal Insurance Co.
as 0:2023cv01921
Plaintiff:
David W. Tafelski
Defendant:
Progressive Universal Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv01583
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Loe et al v. Walz et al
as 0:2023cv01527
Plaintiff:
Melinda Loe, Mark Loe, Dawn Erickson and others
Defendant:
Tim Walz, Willie Jett and Minnesota Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
