Cases 11 - 20 of 22
TELFAIR v. POST et al
as 1:2018cv03842
Defendant:
JOHN POST , GREGORY E. HILTON , MATTHEW C. GREIMAL and others
Plaintiff:
TOMMIE H. TELFAIR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LAMPON-PAZ v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2016cv09071
Plaintiff:
MANUEL LAMPON-PAZ
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
PITTMAN v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2014cv01568
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PITTMAN
Defendant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT, EVELYN CRUZ CAROFILIS, KATHIE DEFURIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOLEY v. CHRYSLER et al
as 2:2013cv01679
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY P. FOLEY
Defendant:
J. CHRYSLER, JR., ESCALERIA, JOSE MARTINEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02430
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVID v. MILLER et al
as 1:2012cv00969
Plaintiff:
FREEMAN ERICK DAVID
Defendant:
DON MILLER, TOM DESIMONE, MICHAEL GIBISON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ROSS v. UMDNJ et al
as 2:2011cv02620
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE ROSS
Defendant:
UMDNJ, LARRY GLOVER, YANA JEFFERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHANNER v. GLOUCESTER COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2011cv02157
Plaintiff:
JAMIE LEE CHANNER
Defendant:
GLOUCESTER COUNTY JAIL, DEPUTY WARDEN CALDWELL, SGT JARED KORA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02892
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SURRETSKY v. BRIGHTON GARDENS OF EDISON et al
as 2:2009cv02502
Plaintiff:
GARY SURRETSKY
Defendant:
BRIGHTON GARDENS OF EDISON, SUNRISE SENIOR LIVING, INC., SUNRISE SENIOR LIVING SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
