Cases 11 - 20 of 22
WATERS v. THE NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2015cv02842
Plaintiff:
EPHESIAN WATERS
Defendant:
THE NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, WILLIAM J. BRATTON, CYRUS R. VANCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSADO v. THE HUDSON COUNTY COURT et al
as 2:2015cv01412
Plaintiff:
CARLOS R. ROSADO
Defendant:
THE HUDSON COUNTY COURT, THE HUDSON COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE, RAYMOND BEAM, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FIELDS v. VENABLE et al
as 3:2013cv07134
Plaintiff:
MARK FIELDS
Defendant:
SHEILA A. VENABLE, CYNTHIA BURCZYK, JENNY ORTEGA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MULDROW V. CALLAHAN, et al
as 2:2013cv05554
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MULDROW
Defendant:
KEVIN G. CALLAHAN. E.S.Q. and SHEILA A. VENABLE, E.S.Q.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AL-NINA EL v. VENABLE et al
as 2:2013cv05102
Plaintiff:
YESHUAH BEN AL-NINA EL
Defendant:
SHEILA VENABLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AL-NINA EL v. DEPASCALE et al
as 2:2013cv05117
Plaintiff:
YESHUAH BEN AL-NINA EL
Defendant:
PAUL M. DEPASCALE and SHEILA VENABLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VENABLE v. WARREN et al
as 2:2011cv05250
Petitioner:
REGINALD VENABLE
Respondent:
CHARLES WARREN and PAULA T. DOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv04373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
VENABLE v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv03591
Plaintiff:
KENZIE VENABLE
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC. , ABC INC., XYZ CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARL A. VENABLE INC. v. COMMERCE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP #9326 et al
as 2:2009cv02029
Plaintiff:
CARL A. VENABLE INC.
Defendant:
COMMERCE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP #9326, WILLIAM RING, MARTIN O'BOYLE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
