Cases 11 - 20 of 73
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02438
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
LOCADIA v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PA et al
as 5:2012cv05655
Plaintiff:
VICTOR M. LOCADIA
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROBERT MEYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOCADIA v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, DOMESTIC RELATIONS SECTION et al
as 5:2012cv05671
Plaintiff:
VICTOR M. LOCADIA
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, DOMESTIC RELATIONS SECTION, CARMEN DELVALLE, TONI DELVALLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ZAPATA v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY et al
as 2:2012cv05535
Plaintiff:
VICTOR M. ZAPATA
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY , JULIO M. ALGARIN and JAMES FREY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SANTOS v. FOSTER WHEELER CO.
as 2:2011cv68338
Plaintiff:
VICTOR M. SANTOS
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER CO.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
ALICEA v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPANSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv54648
Plaintiff:
VICTOR M. ALICEA
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPANSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
TORRES v. FOSTER WHEELER CO, ET AL
as 2:2011cv55646
Plaintiff:
VICTOR M TORRES
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER CO, ET AL
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
ALICEA v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2011cv54350
Plaintiff:
VICTOR M. ALICEA
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
ESCALERA v. MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv68044
Plaintiff:
VICTOR M. ESCALERA
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
ALICEA v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv54507
Plaintiff:
VICTOR M. ALICEA
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
