Cases filed in Minnesota
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,218
Beard v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv00149
Plaintiff: Anthony Beard and Anthony W. Beard
Defendant: 3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Beck v. Barr et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2023cv03863
Plaintiff: Reverend Doctor Beck
Defendant: William Pelham Barr, John G. Roberts, Lavenski R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coonradt v. Krick et al
as 0:2023cv03846
Plaintiff: Joshua Jordan Coonradt
Defendant: Bret Joseph Krick, Luke William Hennen, Nchangnyuy K. Fondungallah and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Clayborne v. Minnesota Department of Corrections, The et al
as 0:2023cv03612
Plaintiff: Jay Rodney Richard Clayborne
Defendant: Minnesota Department of Corrections, The, Brian Collins, Kristina Rish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garvin v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv03405
Plaintiff: Samuel W Garvin and Samuel W. Garvin
Defendant: 3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Brown et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv03225
Plaintiff: Shirley Brown and Richard W. Brown
Defendant: 3M Company, Arizant Healthcare, Inc and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Turner et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv03174
Plaintiff: Charles W Turner and Debra Turner
Defendant: 3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Kelso v. 3M Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2023cv03073
Plaintiff: Larry G Kelso
Defendant: 3M Company, CHCA Pearland L.P. doing business as HCA Houston Healthcare Pearland, HCA Pearland GP, Inc. and others
Slater v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02995
Rued et al v. Hatcher et al
as 0:2023cv02685
Plaintiff: Joseph Daryll Rued, W.O.R., Scott Daryll Rued and others
Defendant: Judge Charlene W. Hatcher, Jennifer L. Frisch, Sarah I. Wheelock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?