Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Parrish v. Dingman et al
as 3:2016cv03095
Plaintiff:
Matthew Wade Parrish
Defendant:
Jason Dingman , Dennis Hagenson and Hamilton County, Iowa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sigler v. United States of America
as 3:2016cv03027
Petitioner:
Lonnie Wade Sigler
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
General Electric Capital Corporation v. Bailey's Backhoe and Excavating, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00124
Plaintiff:
General Electric Capital Corporation
Defendant:
Bailey's Backhoe and Excavating, LLC and Wade Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Heiden v. Unknown Deputy Clerk et al
as 3:2013cv03017
Plaintiff:
Wade Heiden
Defendant:
Unknown Deputy Clerk, Hamilton County Clerks Office and Hamilton County, Iowa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heiden v. United States of America
as 3:2012cv03093
Petitioner:
Wade Charles Heiden
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Heiden v. Webster City Police Dept et al
as 3:2012cv03044
Plaintiff:
Wade Charles Heiden
Defendant:
Webster City Police Dept and Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jarvi et al v. City of Cedar Rapids, Iowa
as 1:2011cv00128
Plaintiff:
Nathan Jarvi , Jason Wade and Beverly Dittmar
Defendant:
City of Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Moritz v. Iowa Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2011cv00127
Plaintiff:
Christopher Wade Moritz
Defendant:
Iowa Department of Corrections, Steve Slough, Mark Lund and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
