Cases 11 - 20 of 58
RAKER v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 4:2020cv00335
Defendant:
WAKULLA COUNTY JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, RONALD W FLURY, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN H RAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raker v. Coleman et al
as 1:2020cv02231
Respondent:
Jackie Fulford, Timothy Carr, Georgia Dept of Corrections and others
Petitioner:
Dustin H. Raker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Raker v. Coleman et al
as 4:2020cv00114
Respondent:
Jackie Fulford, Timothy Carr, Georgia Dept of Corrections and others
Petitioner:
Dustin H. Raker
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CITY WALK - URBAN MISSION INC v. WAKULLA COUNTY FLORIDA
as 4:2020cv00244
Plaintiff:
City Walk - Urban Mission, Inc. and CITY WALK - URBAN MISSION INC
Defendant:
WAKULLA COUNTY and WAKULLA COUNTY FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
GALE v. DOC et al
as 4:2019cv00055
Defendant:
WAKULLA COUNTY FIRE AND RESCUE, DOC MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, TALLAHASSEE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL and others
Plaintiff:
SHAKOY R GALE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00586
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Milan v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 1:2016cv23632
Plaintiff:
Novakov Milan
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General , Secretary of The Department of Homeland Security , U.S. ICE Field Office for the Northern District of Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
