Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Wells v. ETSU Family Physicians of Bristol et al
as 2:2011cv00121
Plaintiff:
Richard A Wells
Defendant:
ETSU Family Physicians of Bristol , Greystone Health Care Center , Wellmont Bristol Regional Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Devante v. Woods et al
as 2:2011cv02176
Plaintiff:
Allison Devante
Defendant:
Paul Woods, Timothy Rush, Tonia Cope and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gentry v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2009cv00854
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Gentry
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, (f/n/u) Miller, Rutherford County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cope v. The City of Knoxville et al
as 3:2009cv00383
Plaintiff:
Billie Sue Cope
Defendant:
The City of Knoxville, Knoxville Police Department, J Atyymouch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gentry v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2009mc00169
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Gentry
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, (f/n/u) Miller, Rutherford County Jail and others
Rutherford Property Owners, LLC et al v. Rutherford County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2009cv00413
Plaintiff:
Rutherford Property Owners, LLC and BPU Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Rutherford County, Tennessee and James C. Cope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shelton et al v. Rutherford County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2009cv00318
Plaintiff:
Steve Shelton, William Albert Shelton, Jennifer R. Shelton and others
Defendant:
Rutherford County, Tennessee and James C. Cope
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lillard v. Jones et al
as 3:2008cv01073
Plaintiff:
Corey M. Lillard, Sr.
Defendant:
Truman Jones and Bill Cope
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lillard v. Jones et al
as 3:2008mc00195
Plaintiff:
Corey M. Lillard, Sr.
Defendant:
Truman Jones and Bill Cope
Smotherman v. Jones et al
as 3:2007cv01237
Plaintiff:
Patrick E. Smotherman
Defendant:
Truman Jones, (f/n/u) Little and (f/n/u) Cope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
