Cases 11 - 20 of 198
SMITH v. CLARK
as 1:2022cv00220
Petitioner:
WAYNE N. SMITH, JR.
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL CLARK, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ERIE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jesus Christ et al v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2022cv01084
Plaintiff:
Jesus Christ and Michael Scott Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania, District Council 89 of Middle District Commonwealth Pennsylvania Members, Franklin County Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith, Jr. v. Zanic et al
as 1:2022cv00609
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
George N. Zanic and David G. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith, Jr. v. Myers et al
as 1:2022cv00343
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Shawn Myers and Mary Beth Shank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith, Jr. v. Fogel
as 1:2022cv00378
Petitioner:
Michael Scott Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
Mathew Fogel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith, Jr. v. Myers
as 1:2022cv00076
Petitioner:
Michael S. Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
Shawn Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SMITH
as 2:2021cv05001
In Re:
CHARLES E. SMITH and CHARLES E. SMITH, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith, Jr. v. Franklin County Court of Common Pleas et al
as 1:2021cv01032
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Franklin County Jail, Franklin County Court of Common Pleas and Pennsylvania State Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENRY v. ROSATI et al
as 2:2020cv05115
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1, NATHANEIL SMITH, JR., JOHN DOE #3 and others
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE HENRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith, Jr. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv00670
Plaintiff:
David W. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
