Cases 11 - 20 of 41
OVERSTREET et al v. WORTH COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 1:2020cv00095
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE OVERSTREET and CHELSEA WELCH
Defendant:
JOHN SUMNER, JOHN DOES, JEFF HOBBY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
MCCANTS v. WORTH COUNTY et al
as 1:2019cv00137
Plaintiff:
DALESIA MCCANTS
Defendant:
SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT OF WORTH COUNTY, WORTH COUNTY and SHAWN FELTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEMENESS v. WORTH COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 1:2019cv00120
Defendant:
DON WHITAKER, JEFFREY HAROLD HOBBY and WORTH COUNTY GEORGIA
Plaintiff:
LON P KEMENESS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fletcher v. City of Forth Worth
as 1:2019cv03258
Defendant:
City of Forth Worth
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jamal Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. Dallas, TX Veterans Hospital Police Officers et al
as 1:2019cv02214
Defendant:
Dallas, TX Veterans Hospital Police Officers, Fort Worth, TX Veterans, Fort McPherson Clinic and others
Plaintiff:
Cary Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04978
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Cajun Global LLC et al v. Thomas & Irons, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00538
Plaintiff:
Cajun Global LLC , Cajun Funding Corp. and Cajun Realty, LLC
Defendant:
Thomas & Irons, LLC, CRW, LLC, Roy L. Irons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
EL BEY v. WORTH COUNTY STATE COURT
as 1:2017cv00188
Plaintiff:
TEHIB MAHIEM EL BEY
Defendant:
WORTH COUNTY STATE COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
North Haven at John's Creek et al v. McGill
as 1:2017cv03048
Plaintiff:
North Haven at John's Creek and Worthing Southeast Property Mgmt, LLC
Defendant:
Tamica McGill
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
RUSHIN v. CALDWELL et al
as 5:2017cv00183
Plaintiff:
RONALD EARLE RUSHIN
Defendant:
CALDWELL, SPANN, PUTTINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
