Cases 11 - 20 of 194
Ista v. Anoka County et al
as 0:2023cv01204
Plaintiff:
Jason Carl Ista
Defendant:
Anoka County, Washington County, Ramsey County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tanton et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00668
Plaintiff:
William Tanton, Mark Bailey, Andrew Ito and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Washington v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv00624
Plaintiff:
Keith Washington
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Fiege v. MEnD Correctional Care et al
as 0:2023cv00602
Plaintiff:
Jared Fiege
Defendant:
MEnD Correctional Care, Todd Leonard, Saint Louis County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hines v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv00604
Plaintiff:
Frederick Dewayne Hines
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, County of Washington, City of Stillwater and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evenstad v. Lynden et al
as 0:2023cv00498
Plaintiff:
Thomas Evenstad
Defendant:
Tom Lynden, A.J. Lague, Eric Chaleaux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00391
Plaintiff:
William Taylor, Mario Debarros, Alphadel McKee and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Jefferson et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00369
Plaintiff:
Troy Jefferson, Jennifer Light, Robert Summers and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Washington v. City of St. Paul et al
as 0:2022cv02899
Plaintiff:
Joseph Washington
Defendant:
City of St. Paul, Anthony Dean, Colleen Rooney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington v. Minnesota Dept. of Corrections' Supervisor Officials et al
as 0:2022cv02277
Plaintiff:
Monroe Bernard Washington
Defendant:
Minnesota Dept. of Corrections' Supervisor Officials, MCF-OPH, MCF-STW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
