Cases 11 - 20 of 7,688
San Miguel Hospital Corporation v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2023cv00903
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Allergen Finance, LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
San Miguel Hospital Corporation on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated doing business as Alta Vista Regional Hospital
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Desjarlais v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 1:2023op45008
Plaintiff:
Roxanne Desjarlais
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc., AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In re: In re: Sensipar Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Tablets
as 23-2217
Not Classified By Court:
In re: SENSIPAR CINACALCET HYDROCHLORIDE TABLETS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CESAR CASTILLO LLC, KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC and TEAMSTERS WESTERN REGION & LOCAL 177 HEALTH CARE PLAN
Appellant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC, WATSON LABORATORIES INC, ACTAVIS PHARMA INC and others
Appellee:
UFCW LOCAL 1500 WELFARE FUND, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 WELFARE FUND and TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 RETIREES BENEFIT FUND
In re: Sensipar Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Tablets
as 23-2214
Not Classified By Court:
In re: SENSIPAR CINACALCET HYDROCHLORIDE TABLETS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UFCW LOCAL 1500 WELFARE FUND, CESAR CASTILLO LLC, KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC and others
Appellant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC, WATSON LABORATORIES INC, ACTAVIS PHARMA INC and others
Appellee:
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 WELFARE FUND and TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 RETIREES BENEFIT FUND
In re: In re: Sensipar Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Tablets
as 23-2215
Not Classified By Court:
In re: SENSIPAR CINACALCET HYDROCHLORIDE TABLETS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CESAR CASTILLO LLC, KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC and TEAMSTERS WESTERN REGION & LOCAL 177 HEALTH CARE PLAN
Appellant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC, WATSON LABORATORIES INC, ACTAVIS PHARMA INC and others
Appellee:
UFCW LOCAL 1500 WELFARE FUND, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 WELFARE FUND and TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 RETIREES BENEFIT FUND
In re: In re: Sensipar Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Tablets
as 23-2213
Not Classified By Court:
In re: SENSIPAR CINACALCET HYDROCHLORIDE TABLETS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CESAR CASTILLO LLC, KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC and TEAMSTERS WESTERN REGION & LOCAL 177 HEALTH CARE PLAN
Appellant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC, WATSON LABORATORIES INC, ACTAVIS PHARMA INC and others
Appellee:
UFCW LOCAL 1500 WELFARE FUND, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 WELFARE FUND and TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 RETIREES BENEFIT FUND
In re: In re: Sensipar Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Tablets
as 23-2216
Not Classified By Court:
In re: SENSIPAR CINACALCET HYDROCHLORIDE TABLETS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CESAR CASTILLO LLC, KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC and TEAMSTERS WESTERN REGION & LOCAL 177 HEALTH CARE PLAN
Appellant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC, WATSON LABORATORIES INC, ACTAVIS PHARMA INC and others
Appellee:
UFCW LOCAL 1500 WELFARE FUND, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 WELFARE FUND and TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 RETIREES BENEFIT FUND
Demming v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 1:2023op45007
Plaintiff:
Shoneteal Demming
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc., AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Parmeley v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00605
Defendant:
Allergan, PLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Parmeley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sensipar Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Tablets AntitrusIn re: Sensipar Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Tablets Antitrus
as 23-8020
Plaintiff:
In re: SENSIPAR CINACALCET HYDROCHLORIDE TABLETS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Respondent:
CESAR CASTILLO LLC, KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC, TEAMSTERS WESTERN REGION & LOCAL 177 HEALTH CARE PLAN and others
Petitioner:
AMGEN INC, TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC, WATSON LABORATORIES INC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
