Cases 11 - 20 of 1,197
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Perry v. Scandrett et al
as 1:2024cv01017
Plaintiff:
Angela Perry cor. sole. doing business as Infinite Ascension Express Trust
Defendant:
Reginald B. Scandrett, Stephen N. Knights, Jr., Pamela Bettis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00917
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
WHITED v. GAINES et al
as 7:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
DESHAWN THOMAS WHITED
Defendant:
GAINES, BLACKSHEAR, FOLSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
ADAN v. AMERICAN WHITE GOVERNMENT
as 3:2024cv00008
Petitioner:
SALEEVAN ADAN
Respondent:
AMERICAN WHITE GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ADAN v. AMERICAN WHITE GOVERNMENT
as 5:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
SALEEBAN ADAN
Defendant:
AMERICAN WHITE GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. White et al
as 1:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Adrianne Kelly
Defendant:
Officer Aaron White, Officer Choan Pinkston and Cobb County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woody v. Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Woody
Defendant:
Keybo Taylor, Cleophas Atwater, J. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunn v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
John O. Dunn, II
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Joseph Burnette, Mr. Singleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
