Cases 11 - 20 of 93
WHITEHEAD et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2021cv20096
Plaintiff:
TAVIA M. WHITEHEAD and RALPH L. WHITEHEAD
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP and MCKESSON CORP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MUHAMMAD v. FIGUREROA et al
as 2:2021cv03372
Plaintiff:
KAREEM MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
CYNTHIA FIGUREROA, LATOYA CARR-HERMITT, CHARLENE SAMUELS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITEHEAD v. LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03364
Plaintiff:
CANDACE WHITEHEAD
Defendant:
LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., AMERICAN REGENT, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WHITEHEAD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2020cv06585
Plaintiff:
KENNETH SHABBAZZ WHITEHEAD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv04039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
BYARD v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA LAW DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2019cv02415
Defendant:
SANIYYAH JONES-WHITEHEAD, EZEQUIEL CORTEZ, DETECTIVE JEFFREY PARKER and others
Plaintiff:
CHRIS D. BYARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Liberto et al v. Berryhill et al
as 3:2017cv01348
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Michael Liberto and Luisa Liberto
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill, Castaneda, Dan Whitehead, PhD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Liberto et al v. Berryhill et al
as 4:2017cv01348
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Michael Liberto and Luisa Liberto
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill, Castaneda, Dan Whitehead, PhD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CORIZON HEALTH, INC. v. WHITEHEAD
as 2:2017cv01807
Plaintiff:
CORIZON HEALTH, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN T. WHITEHEAD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
