Cases 11 - 20 of 125
HUNTER v. CTF
as 1:2022cv03865
Plaintiff:
STEVEN HUNTER
Defendant:
CTF, DC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and HEALTH SERVICES CTF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUNTER v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY OFFICE et al
as 1:2022cv03866
Plaintiff:
STEVEN HUNTER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY OFFICE, SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and JAMES ANDREW LOWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ROWE v. PCHANGE PROTECTIVE SERVICES LLC et al
as 1:2022cv03098
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ROWE
Defendant:
PCHANGE PROTECTIVE SERVICES LLC, VESTA CORPORATION, BRYAN HUNTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
HUNTER v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2022cv01869
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MALCOLM HUNTER
Defendant:
WARDEN, HEALTH SERVICE ADMINISTRATOR, JOHN DOE, 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUNTER v. WARDEN
as 1:2022cv01800
Petitioner:
STEVEN MALCOLM HUNTER
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01788
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
HUNTER v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2022cv01787
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MALCOLM HUNTER
Defendant:
WARDEN, COMMISSIONER, A/W OF MEDICAL CENTRAL PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAYFLOWER TRANSIT, LLC v. POWERS
as 1:2022cv00872
Plaintiff:
MAYFLOWER TRANSIT LLC and MAYFLOWER TRANSIT, LLC
Defendant:
SAMUEL HUNTER POWERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
