Cases 11 - 16 of 16
Powell's Books, Inc., et al v. John Kroeger, et al
as 09-35153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
POWELL'S BOOKS, INC., OLD MULTNOMAH BOOK STORE, LTD., DBA Annie Bloom's Books, DARK HORSE COMICS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OREGON, CANDACE MORGAN, PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE COLUMBIA/WILLAMETTE, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
HARDY MYERS, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Oregon, MATT SHIRTCLIFF, Baker County District Attorney, in his official capacity, JOHN HAROLDSON, Benton County District Attorney, in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae:
THE THOMAS JEFFERSON CENTER FOR THE PROTECTION OF FREE EXPRESSION
American Civil Liberties Union, et al v. John Kroger, et al
as 09-35154
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OREGON, CANDACE MORGAN, PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE COLUMBIA/WILLAMETTE, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
POWELL'S BOOKS, INC., OLD MULTNOMAH BOOK STORE, LTD., DBA Annie Bloom's Books, DARK HORSE COMICS, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
HARDY MYERS, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Oregon, MATT SHIRTCLIFF, Baker County District Attorney, in his official capacity, JOHN HAROLDSON, Benton County District Attorney, in his official capacity and others
CROOK v. REA EXPRESS INC
as 2:2008cv90733
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CROOK and WILLIAM CROOK
Defendant:
REA EXPRESS INC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
William Crook v. Westinghouse Electric Corporatio, et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-82359
Defendant:
Westinghouse Electric Corporatio
Plaintiff:
William Crook
CROOK v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv82359
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CROOK
Defendant:
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, ABER INSULATION, ABNEY MILLS and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Crook v. USA
as 4:2007cv00395
Petitioner:
Douglas William Crook
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
