Cases 11 - 20 of 280
SANTILLAN v. WINGFIELD
as 5:2023cv00308
Petitioner:
JOE RAMON SANTILLAN
Respondent:
BARRY WINGFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CHEATHAM v. WINGFIELD et al
as 5:2023cv00278
Petitioner:
MELODIE CHEATHAM
Respondent:
A W WINGFIELD and MARIANNA FDC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WINGFIELD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv15888
Plaintiff:
JAMES WINGFIELD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Wingfield v. Garner
as 23-40547
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Bernard Wingfield
Defendant / Appellee:
Unknown Garner, CO, Unknown Hinejosa, CO, Unknown Ellis, Sergeant, Michael Unit and others
HILLS v. PISTRO
as 5:2023cv00242
Petitioner:
JESSICA HILLS
Respondent:
PISTRO, WINGFIELD, BOOZEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wingfield v. Warden, FCC Coleman-1
as 5:2023cv00562
Petitioner:
James H Wingfield and James H. Wingfield
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman-1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
DORSEY v. PISTRO et al
as 5:2023cv00226
Petitioner:
BRIDGETT DORSEY
Respondent:
PISTRO and WINGFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DORSEY v. PISTRO et al
as 4:2023cv00368
Plaintiff:
BRIDGETT DORSEY
Defendant:
PISTRO and WINGFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wingfield v. Harr et al
as 5:2023cv00504
Plaintiff:
James Wingfield
Defendant:
FNU Harr, FNU Bolstick, FNU Withers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
