Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Lightfeather v. PornHub.com et al
as 8:2021cv00146
Defendant:
Buttman, Google.com, Brenda Mae Stinson and others
Plaintiff:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lightfeather v. Woods et al
as 8:2021cv00115
Defendant:
Jevon Woods and Black Lives Matter Movement
Plaintiff:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Wood v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 8:2021cv00017
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
David G. Wood
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Lightfeather v. Osborn et al
as 4:2020cv03118
Defendant:
Trevor, Dawn, Malinda, Brenda Mae Stinson, Rusty Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green Plains Trade Group LLC et al v. Archer Daniels Midland Company
as 8:2020cv00279
Plaintiff:
Green Plains Hereford LLC, Green Plains Wood River LLC, Green Plains York LLC and others
Defendant:
Archer Daniels Midland Company
Schneider v. Laminated Wood Systems, Inc.
as 8:2020cv00021
Defendant:
LAMINATED WOOD SYSTEMS, INC.
Plaintiff:
Allison Schneider
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Wood v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 8:2019cv00236
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Roy E. Wood
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Woods v. Correction Care Solutions et al
as 8:2017cv00014
Defendant:
Correction Care Solutions and Lancaster County Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Michael James Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv00068
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Woods v. United States of America
as 8:2015cv00443
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Eddie Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
