Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Ybarra v. Warden
as 3:2021cv00037
Petitioner:
Randy Russell Ybarra and Randy Ybarra
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
YBARRA v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv06294
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff:
RACHEL YBARRA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ybarra v. Bane et al
as 3:2020cv00634
Plaintiff:
Randy Russell Ybarra and Randy Ybarra
Defendant:
Derek Christian, Pamela Bane and Todd Marsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ybarra v. Warden
as 3:2019cv01122
Plaintiff:
Randy Ybarra and Randy Russell Ybarra
Defendant:
Ron Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ybarra v. Warden
as 3:2019cv00968
Petitioner:
Randy Russell Ybarra and Randy R Ybarra
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ybarra v. Indiana Dept of Correction et al
as 3:2019cv00971
Plaintiff:
Randy Russell Ybarra and Randy R Ybarra
Defendant:
Lott, T Johnson, Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ybarra v. Wells County Sheriffs Department et al
as 3:2019cv00733
Plaintiff:
Randy Russell Ybarra and Randy Ybarra
Defendant:
Zack Walker, Monty Fisher, Misty Haddix and others
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ybarra v. Indiana Dep't of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv00343
Plaintiff:
Randy Russell Ybarra
Defendant:
Dunlap, Payne, Lott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ybarra v. Indiana Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv00105
Plaintiff:
Randy Russell Ybarra and Randy R Ybarra
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Corrections, Harman, Neal and others
Undetermined:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01979
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
