Cases 11 - 20 of 768
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00989
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00987
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Wright v. Ernst & Young, LLP
as 1:2024cv00993
Plaintiff:
Quinton Wright
Defendant:
Ernst & Young, LLP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
AGN Glass, LLC v. Copeland et al
as 1:2024cv00814
Plaintiff:
AGN Glass, LLC doing business as Auto Glass Now
Defendant:
Kevin Copeland and Lawrence Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Parks v. Young's Heavy Hauling LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00729
Plaintiff:
Richard Parks
Defendant:
Young's Heavy Hauling LLC, Stonewood Insurance Company and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Bayse v. Ward et al
as 1:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Robbin Amanda Bayse and Robert Bayse
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Sharon Lewis, Jauel Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Garland
as 1:2024cv00217
Petitioner:
Timothy Doyle Young
Respondent:
Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Britt v. Durham et al
as 1:2024cv00118
Defendant:
Chandler Durham, Turbo the Great, Warner-Chappell Music, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jamal Britt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Woody v. Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Woody
Defendant:
Keybo Taylor, Cleophas Atwater, J. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
