Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Dinwiddie v. Roeckeman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv01360
Petitioner: Steve Dinwiddie
Respondent: Zach Roeckeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dinwiddie v. Roeckeman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00995
Plaintiff: Steve Dinwiddie
Defendant: Zach Roeckeman, Jessica Stover, Toni Isaacs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leon Broyles v. Zach Roeckeman
as 13-2335
Petitioner - Appellant: LEON BROYLES
Respondent - Appellee: ZACH ROECKEMAN
Franchot Taylor v. Zach Roeckeman
as 13-1996
Petitioner - Appellant: FRANCHOT B. TAYLOR
Respondent - Appellee: ZACH ROECKEMAN
Shavers v. Ott et al
as 1:2013cv00151
Petitioner: Romalice Shavers
Respondent: Zach Roeckeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Broyles v. Roeckmen et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv07702
Petitioner: Leon Broyles
Respondent: Zach Roeckeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tanaka Birdo v. Marion County Sheriff's Depar, et al
as 10-1641
Plaintiff - Appellant: TANAKA BIRDO
Defendant - Appellee: MARION COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, JERRY DEVORE, Sheriff, JIM BURGESS, Officer and others
Jones v. Stansberry et al
as 5:2010cv00017
Petitioner: Torrance Jones
Respondent: Patricia R. Stansberry and Zach Roeckeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Jones v. Stansberry et al
as 1:2009cv01358
Petitioner: Torrance Jones
Respondent: Patricia R. Stansberry and Zach Roeckeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. Stansberry et al
as 3:2009cv00938
Petitioner: Torrance Jones
Respondent: Patricia R. Stansberry and Zach Roeckeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?