Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Pew v. Huber et al
as 3:2015cv01407
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Percy Pew
Defendant:
Huber, Sneck, Digby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SLOAN v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2015cv00170
Plaintiff:
AARON SLOAN
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, ULLI KLEMM, FAITH AKDEMIR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. BORING et al
as 2:2015cv03264
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
BORING, LAUREL HARRY, JAMES MEINTEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy-Gibson v. Hubber et al
as 3:2015cv00786
Plaintiff:
Kelly McCoy-Gibson
Defendant:
A. Hubber, B. McBeth, Cleaveland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hankins v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2014cv01557
Plaintiff:
Robert Hankins
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Harry, Vincent Mooney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Wicks v. Kimberly Barkley, et al
as 13-3624
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID BRYANT WICKS
Defendant - Appellee:
KIMBERLY A. BARKLEY, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Probation and Parole, MARIROSA LAMAS, Facility Manager of Rockview, TIM MILLER, Correctional Class & Program Manager of Rockview and others
Jamison v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2013cv02129
Plaintiff:
Dashawn L. Jamison
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Steven R. Glunt, Jeffrey Ditty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drummond et al v. Harry et al
as 1:2013cv01891
Plaintiff:
Gerald Drummond and Michael Burkhart
Defendant:
Laurel R. Harry, J. Meintel, T. Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Southers et al
as 3:2013cv01603
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Robinson
Defendant:
Richard Southers, John Wetzel, Shirley Moore-Smeal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parran v. Voorstead et al
as 3:2013cv00275
Plaintiff:
Randall Eugene Parran
Defendant:
Theodore Voorstead, E. A. Shoop, Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
