Cases 11 - 20 of 111
Weeks v. Stewart et al
as 6:2022cv06074
Plaintiff:
Paul Michael Weeks
Defendant:
Deputy Stewart, Rashad Nalls, Litzsey G Everett, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weeks v. Stewart et al
as 4:2022cv00595
Plaintiff:
Paul Michael Weeks
Defendant:
Stewart, Rashad Nalls, Litzsey G Everett, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. USA
as 4:2022cv00317
Petitioner:
Brandon Everett Brown
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Everett v. Creach et al
as 4:2022cv00265
Plaintiff:
Christopher Everett
Defendant:
Creach, Jones, Frost and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Everett v. Smit et al
as 4:2022cv00266
Plaintiff:
Christopher Everett
Defendant:
Smit, Jones and Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Everett v. Courtney
as 4:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
Christopher Everett
Defendant:
Courtney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Everett v. Jones et al
as 4:2022cv00086
Plaintiff:
Christopher Everett
Defendant:
Jones, Barber, Does "Corporal", "Control Tower Corporal" White County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Everett v. Barber et al
as 4:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
Christopher Alan Everett
Defendant:
Barber, Jones, Does "Nurse Courtney"; "Unknown Corporal" and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alverson et al v. Elkhart Products Corporation
as 5:2021cv05191
Plaintiff:
Nikia Alverson, Elizabeth Asbury, Teri Bourquin and others
Defendant:
Elkhart Products Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Everett et al v. Central One Service LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00641
Plaintiff:
Cody Everett and Katie Rodriguez
Defendant:
Central One Service LLC and Jeremy Fairchild
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
