Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Acosta et al v. Kellogg Brown & Root LLC, et al.
as 1:2015cv01024
Plaintiff:
Ronald Layne Smith, Ryan C. Rasmussen, Reginald J. Belton and others
Defendant:
Kellogg Brown & Root LLC, KBR, Inc., Halliburton Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ivins v. Harmon et al
as 1:2014cv01282
Plaintiff:
Richard C. Ivins
Defendant:
Joseph Harmon , Brian Thompson , Nathan Klahr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00938
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Todic v. Star Scientific Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01994
Plaintiff:
Dennis Todic
Defendant:
Star Scientific Inc. , Paul L. Perito , Jonnie R. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Shankaras v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00828
Plaintiff:
Roman Shankaras
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll, Rick Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shankaras v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00829
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll, Rick Kearney and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickens et al v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00786
Plaintiff:
Kevin L. Dickens, Roman Shankaras and Thomas Gordon
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll, Rick Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Beckles et al
as 1:2010cv00362
Plaintiff:
Gregory F. Robinson
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Perry Phelps, Scaroborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Attorney General of State of Delaware et al
as 1:2009cv00896
Petitioner:
Everett E. Smith
Respondent:
Attorney General of State of Delaware and Perry Phelps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Everett v. Phelps et al
as 1:2009cv00097
Petitioner:
Patrick D. Everett
Respondent:
Perry Phelps and Attorney General of State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
