Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01251
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Moore v. Cain et al
as 2:2017cv02057
Defendant:
Nurse Cagle, Superintendent Brad Cain, Nurse A. Clements and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Everett Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivers v. Warner et al
as 3:2016cv02190
Defendant:
Mr. Aaron Dauchy and Mr. Bruce Warner
Plaintiff:
Martin Everett Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Lowry v. University of Oregon Medical School et al
as 3:2016cv01049
Defendant:
M.D. Herbert Common, M.D. Dennis M. DeLeo, John Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Giovanni Lowry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Myrick et al
as 2:2016cv00618
Defendant:
Dr. Leland Beamer, Christopher P. DiGulio, Linda Gruenwald and others
Plaintiff:
Everett James Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrington v. State of Oregon et al
as 1:2016cv00200
Defendant:
Jeff Allison, Brenda Bateman, Brad Bennet and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Allen Harrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Woodward v. Swanson et al
as 1:2015cv01931
Defendant:
Klamath County, Klamath Police Department, Rob Patridge and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Everett Woodward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01561
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rawson v. Nielsen et al
as 1:2015cv01553
Defendant:
Dr. Sheree Everett and KCAC Jim Nielsen
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Rawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fye v. United States of America
as 2:2015cv01125
Plaintiff:
Everett Earl Fye
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
