Cases 11 - 20 of 9,357
Solis v. Yazoo City USP et al
as 1:2024cv04905
Petitioner:
Leonel Solis
Respondent:
Yazoo City USP and FCI Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04885
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mercedes Benz Financial Services USA, LLC v. City of Chicago
as 1:2024cv04840
Plaintiff:
Mercedes Benz Financial Services USA, LLC
Defendant:
City of Chicaho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marquez v. Party City Holdco, Inc.
as 1:2024cv04808
Plaintiff:
Marisol Marquez
Defendant:
Party City Holdco, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Vitellaro v. City of Park Ridge et al
as 1:2024cv04797
Plaintiff:
Michael Vitellaro
Defendant:
City of Park Ridge, Frank Kaminski, Lynn McCarthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woods v. Bloomington et al
as 1:2024cv01211
Plaintiff:
Eric Woods
Defendant:
City of Bloomington and Weston Gresham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Weekly v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv04752
Plaintiff:
London Weekly
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Alvin Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nubani Ihmoud v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv04726
Plaintiff:
Samar Nubani Ihmoud
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Illinois State Police and Francis Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hill v. Wolfe et al
as 2:2024cv02126
Plaintiff:
Demetrius G Hill
Defendant:
Julie Moore Wolfe, City of Decatur Illinois, Jim Root and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
