Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 165,141
Joe v. LNU 3:24-CV-1072
as 3:2024cv01072
Petitioner: Demarcus Kenard Joe
Respondent: FNU LNU 3:24-CV-1072
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Joe v. LNU 3:24-CV-1071
as 3:2024cv01071
Plaintiff: Demarcus Kenard Joe
Defendant: FNU LNU 3:24-CV-1071
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Havens v. Chapa et al
as 2:2024cv00105
Plaintiff: Christopher Dale Havens
Defendant: Amando Chapa, Corporal Fincher, Appel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shead et al v. State of Texas Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00473
Plaintiff: Travarus Shead, Enrique Guerra and Barry Emmett
Defendant: State of Texas Corporation, Greg Abbot, TDCJ Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cantu-Cox v. USA
as 2:2024cv01124
Petitioner: Christopher Cantu-Cox
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate
Cantu-Cox v. USA
as 2:2024cv01125
Petitioner: Carlos Mario Cantu-Cox
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate
Lewis v. Sealy
as 2:2024cv01120
Plaintiff: Don Lewis
Defendant: Sherri Sealy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hays v. Hooper
as 3:2024cv00579
Plaintiff: Cameron Hays
Defendant: Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chappell v. Haley
as 1:2024cv00128
Plaintiff: Grady Eugene Chappell
Defendant: Matt Haley
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sellers v. Scott County Detention Center
as 3:2024cv00245
Plaintiff: Zachary Wade Sellers
Defendant: Scott County Detention Center
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?